Yes or no: Are these tech hearings doing anything?

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey posted a tweet at Congress’ first hearing on Thursday with Facebook, Google and Twitter chief executives. It was a question mark with two answers yes and no.

Earlier this year in the US Capitol, Dorsi, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Google CEO Sundar Pichai’s platform were obvious trolls aimed at lawmakers for their role in spreading misinformation and inciting violent riots. . Due to limited time to ask questions, members will stop responding from the CEO and not answer “yes” or “no” or at all.

However, while the hearings were focused on finding a solution to the most serious press freedom conflict in history, Dorsey’s tweet symbolized how seriously everyone was taking it rather than taking it seriously.


This is not the first time Zuckerberg, Dorsey and Pichai have testified in Congress. However, a pro-Trump mob attacked the Capitol on January 6 and was taken for the first time after several deaths. QAnon followers and right-wing online influencers are just a few of the individuals involved in the attack, mostly organized and broadcast live on social media.

Prior to the hearing, Congressman Frank Pallone (D-NJ) Politico, “This isn’t just a hearing to hear the same old thing.” “We want to know what we can legally do. We want to pass the law.”

But even after direct insults of democracy, lawmakers weren’t organized and commented on incorporating culture cancellation, Mr. Potato Head, competition, privacy and mediation into huge, difficult-to-solve problems.

Ahead of Thursday’s hearing, only one lawmaker, Anna Eshoo (D-CA), introduced a “law to protect Americans from dangerous algorithms.” And Congressman Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) held an event to discuss section 230 reforms.

However, it doesn’t appear that the House of Representatives is getting closer to drafting the actual legislative reform after the hearing. In other words, Congress has failed to communicate personal complaints and provide practical solutions.

In some cases, lawmakers have asked tech executives to do more than they can achieve. Assemblyman Doris Matsui (D-CA) has called for an increase in anti-Asian violence and hate expressions. But as my boss Nilay Patel pointed out On TwitterIn the United States, there is no hate speech policy, and legislation will be difficult to pass.

In the past, legislation has driven tech companies to take action on their own. After the 2016 presidential election, Senate Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Mark Warner (D-VA) introduced the Honest Ads Act. The bill hasn’t been passed, but it has put pressure on Facebook and Google to host their own transparent ad databases. However, when it comes to content coordination and Section 230 reform, Facebook, Google, and Twitter mostly oppose significant changes in the law. Meaningful reforms must be made in Congress.

Immediately after the January 6 attack, Warner, Klobuchar and Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) has introduced the SAFE TECH Act, which allows users to open new avenues for suing tech companies if content posted on the platform is personally threatened with harassment. Discrimination or other forms of abuse. The Eshoo legislation removes the exemption under section 230 if the platform’s algorithm proves to promote or encourage content related to terrorist acts or civil rights violations.

Nonetheless, none of these bills received a lot of adversarial support from hearings or per second. In the Senate, Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) will chair the Judicial Council’s Privacy and Technology Subcommittee. In the interview Politico Earlier this month, Coons said in some cases, it would be a better option for Congress to do nothing.

“I sometimes oversee hearings and letters in areas where technology is moving fairly quickly. [and] Talking to the leaders of a major social media company could lead them to change practices faster than we can legislate,” Coons said. Politico.

But when does the hearing fail to force the change Congress wants? On Thursday, it seemed that we were approaching that threshold quickly. Little new information was found in Zuckerberg and Pichai. Dorsey bookmarked the tweet and sent him a stupid poll.

What are your future plans?

Coons said Politico His Senate Judiciary Panel plans to bring these officers back for another hearing sometime in the future. But it is not clear when it will happen. Most actions on technological reform are likely to come from the House Judiciary Committee. Last week, the committee completed a final antitrust hearing on technology. Chairman David Cicilline (D-RI) said: Axios A huge competition bill is expected to come out in the coming weeks.

“My strategy is to see a lot of legislation being introduced. [the tech companies] It’s about managing and opposing ten bills, not one,” Cicilline said. Axios.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




The Asus ZenFone 8 is an Android iPhone mini

After generations of making phones with flip cameras and increasingly larger displays, Asus took the ZenFone 8 in a completely different...

The Best Power Supply Brands 2021

Never buy a cheap power supply from an unknown brand in this age of updated technology. Choose the best power supply brand in 2021...

Facebook strikes News Corp deal to license news from Australian media outlets

Facebook last month blocked the ability for Australian users and media organizations to share newslinks in their country, and now that...

Quick phrases could let you skip ‘Hey, Google’ for common tasks

"Quick Phrase" is a new feature currently being developed for the Google Assistant that may one day allow you to skip...

Sony’s new prime lenses are the small saviors I’ve been looking for

The new Sony 24mm f/2.8, 40mm f/2.5, and 50mm f/2.5 will ship in mid-May with new compact prime lenses for $599.99...